Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1/9/2007
State v. Werner
Citations
- 725 N.W.2d 767
- 2007 Minn. App. LEXIS 6
- 2007 WL 48876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that asking a DWI suspect about alcohol consumption does not constitute an interrogation
- stating that we generally accept a party’s concession
- “While we generally accept a party’s concessions, we need not do so when the party has made a concession on a threshold issue that presents a question of law, particularly when we find fault with the district court’s analysis on the issue.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klaphake, Kalitowski, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-03-13· cited 183×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-27· cited 76×
- State v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-02-19· cited 70×
- State v. TibiatowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-04· cited 25×
- State v. MellettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-04-30· cited 17×
- State v. KlineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-07-10· cited 13×
- State v. PoupardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-06-11· cited 12×
- State v. HedenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-08-10· cited 11×
- State v. UnderdahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-03-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.