Skip to main content

State v. Ferguson

Citations

  • 808 N.W.2d 586
  • 2012 Minn. LEXIS 1
  • 2012 WL 75198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that consecutive sentencing is permissible in cases involving multiple victims
  • “Whether an offense is subject to multiple 9 sentences under Minn. Stat. § 609.035 is a question of law, which [appellate courts] review de novo.”
  • “[T]he legislature did not intend section 609.085 to immunize offenders in every case from the consequences of separate crimes intentionally committed in a single episode against more than one individual.” (quotation omitted)
  • “[T]he legislature did not intend section 609.035 to immunize offenders in every case from the consequences of separate crimes intentionally committed in a single episode against more than one individual.” (quotation omitted)
  • Ferguson II, unrelated to Ferguson I

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Meyer, Paul, Stras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.