Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/27/2013

State v. Hayes

Citations

826 N.W.2d 799
2013 WL 692463
2013 Minn. LEXIS 111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that whether a defendant’s conduct met the statutory definition of a crime presents a question of statutory interpretation, reviewed de novo
explaining the “ ‘separate offense’ interpretation” to be “that subdivision 1e(b) modifies the elements set forth in subdivision 1e(a) to create a separate, aggravated offense”
interpreting a provision of the drive-by-shooting statute as creating a sentence enhancement rather than a separate, aggravated definition of the crime of drive-by shooting
explaining the \ 'sentence enhancement’ interpretation” to be that subdivision 1e(b) \is a sentencing provision setting forth enhanced penalties for particularly serious violations of subdivision 1e(a)”
declining to “consider the remaining [elements] of the plain-error test” after concluding that “the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the challenged testimony”
declining to “consider the remaining prongs of the plain-error test” after concluding that “the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the challenged testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Been, Consideration, Stras, Submission, Took, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.