Hawaii Supreme Court· 1/10/1996

State v. Wallace

Citations

910 P.2d 695
80 Haw. 382
1996 Haw. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an evidentiary ruling did not violate the defendant’s “fundamental rights” and thus could not be noticed as plain error
holding that review for 5/ Nonetheless, the State, relying on State v. Ikaika, 67 Haw. 563, 566, 698 P.2d 281, 284 (1985
holding that “[f]or purposes of article I, section 10, [of the Hawai'i Constitution,] a lesser included offense is an offense that is (1) ‘included’ in a charged offense, within the meaning of HRS § 701-109(4) (1993)[ ], and (2
holding that review for evidentiary sufficiency is based on \substantial and admissible evidence\
holding that review for evidentiary sufficiency is based on \substantial and admissible evidence\
holding that forty-three heat-sealed clear plastic packets containing cocaine seized during warrant allowing search of automobile for marijuana were not “closed” containers with a reasonable expectation of privacy requiring a warrant to conduct a further search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

129 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Wallace

307 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.