Skip to main content

State v. Kim

Citations

  • 645 P.2d 1330
  • 64 Haw. 598
  • 1982 Haw. LEXIS 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding experts may testify regarding child's credibility if certain limitations are met
  • not an abuse of discretion to permit a child psychiatrist to testify that he found complainant's account of alleged rape to be believable
  • not an abuse of discretion to permit a child psychiatrist to testify that he found complainant’s account of alleged rape to be believable
  • child psychiatrist allowed to testify that child’s conduct consistent with other rape victims
  • doctor allowed to testify that he found victim's charge “believable”
  • \expert testimony respecting witness credibility not appropriate to all situations.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Nakamura, Marumoto, Place, Lum, Excused, Ogata, Menor, Vacancies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Kim

50 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.