State v. Pulse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that excluding competent evidence that violated an accused’s constitutional right was considered presumptively prejudicial and holding that the trial court’s error in disallowing a defense witness’s testimony at a suppression hearing was not harmless
• \The testimony of one percipient witness can provide sufficient evidence to support a conviction.\
• \The testimony of one percipient witness can provide sufficient evidence to support a conviction.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).