Ohio Supreme Court· 6/8/1988
State v. Wallace
Citations
- 37 Ohio St. 3d 87
- 524 N.E.2d 466
- 1988 Ohio LEXIS 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming admission of statements as excited utterances even though there was a 15-hour interval between the startling occurrence and the utterance and even though the declarant was unconscious for part of that time
- upholding the admission of a five-year-old girl’s statement as an excited utterance when she made the statement 15 hours after she was assaulted because the girl was unconscious and when she woke up, she made statements without prompting
- \[S]tatements made in response to questions may still be under the stress of the event.\
- “[Statements made in response to questions may still be under the stress of the event.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 674×
- Apolinar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-02-02· cited 360×
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 1993-05-26· cited 309×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 290×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 209×
- State v. HuertasOhio Supreme Court· 1990-05-09· cited 195×
- State v. MuttartOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-11· cited 163×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-13· cited 105×
- State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-07-29· cited 87×
- State v. SimkoOhio Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 76×
- State v. SaidOhio Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 75×
- State v. JacintoOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-16· cited 75×
- State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-03-29· cited 57×
- State v. LittleOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-27· cited 51×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 1994-12-23· cited 49×
- State v. LukacsOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-05-28· cited 48×
- State v. DollingerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-01-23· cited 39×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-11-05· cited 35×
- In re J.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-02· cited 35×
- State v. GutierrezOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-27· cited 24×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DuncanOhio Supreme Court· 1978-03-15· cited 165×
- Wilbert C. Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State FarmSixth Circuit· 1983-08-11· cited 125×
- Johnston v. OhlsWashington Supreme Court· 1969-07-17· cited 89×
- Gibbs Ex Rel. Gibbs v. WilmethSupreme Court of Iowa· 1968-03-05· cited 55×
- United States v. James Glenn, A/K/A James M. GreenD.C. Circuit· 1973-01-30· cited 54×
- State v. McLainArizona Supreme Court· 1952-06-02· cited 53×
- State v. ElzieSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-11-14· cited 45×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-01-31· cited 45×
- State v. RohdesOhio Supreme Court· 1986-05-07· cited 39×
- State v. LaClairSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-08-10· cited 33×
- State v. HendricksSupreme Court of Missouri· 1903-03-17· cited 31×
- Guthrie v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1953-07-30· cited 29×
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-05-19· cited 25×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-03-16· cited 25×
- Davis Transport, Inc. v. BolstadCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1956-11-15· cited 21×
- State v. RoyNebraska Supreme Court· 1983-04-29· cited 19×
- Barton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1931-02-17· cited 19×
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1973-08-20· cited 18×
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1918-04-12· cited 17×
- State v. KaytsoUtah Supreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.