Arizona Supreme Court· 10/29/1986
State v. Wallace
Citations
- 728 P.2d 232
- 151 Ariz. 362
- 1986 Ariz. LEXIS 295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- existence of any of the three elements is sufficient to constitute the § 13-703(F)(6) aggravating factor
- “[T]he fact that defendant killed two children, with whom he admittedly had no dispute and who posed no danger to him, is additional evidence of his ‘shockingly evil state of mind’”
- “As we have set aside the finding of pecuniary gain, we must now allow the trial court another opportunity to exercise its sentencing discretion and reweigh the remaining aggravating and mitigating factors”
- \[W]e find that neither defendant's `difficult earlier years' nor his use of `various drugs' so affected his capacity to conform to the requirements of law that they constitute mitigating factors under § 13-703(G)(1)\
- “[W]e find that neither defendant’s ‘difficult earlier years’ nor his use of ‘various drugs’ so affected his capacity to conform to the requirements of law that they constitute mitigating factors under § 13 — 703(G)(1)”
- insufficient evidence to support pecuniary gain aggravating factor where defendant’s motive was relationship difficulties with the victim and the taking of money and keys was incidental to the murder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Holohan, Gordon, Cameron, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lewis v. JeffersSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,972×
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,614×
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court· 2004-08-09· cited 424×
- State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 217×
- State v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-12-29· cited 217×
- State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court· 1992-12-17· cited 207×
- John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 1988-12-22· cited 192×
- Woodward v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-12-18· cited 192×
- State v. GulbrandsonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 189×
- State v. WaltonArizona Supreme Court· 1989-02-02· cited 167×
- State v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court· 1992-01-28· cited 142×
- State v. GreenwayArizona Supreme Court· 1991-12-03· cited 139×
- State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-30· cited 129×
- State v. SpreitzArizona Supreme Court· 1997-09-11· cited 122×
- Robert Henry Moormann v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2005-10-13· cited 118×
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court· 1993-09-30· cited 113×
- State v. ComerArizona Supreme Court· 1990-07-31· cited 104×
- State v. StanleyArizona Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 96×
- State v. SchackartArizona Supreme Court· 1997-10-30· cited 94×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.