West Virginia Supreme Court· 12/17/1992
State v. Walker
Citations
- 425 S.E.2d 616
- 188 W. Va. 661
- 1992 W. Va. LEXIS 269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- threatening statement that defendant would burn down anyone who angered him inadmissible because it was made at least four months before charged arson
- threatening statement that defendant would burn down anyone who angered him inadmissible because it was made at least four months before charged arson
- “[w]hen the circumstantial nature of the evidence requires the jury to construct a chain of logical inferences in order to find guilt, strict adherence to the rules of evidence be comes crucially important”
- although the State changed to only a felony murder theory by the close of evidence, the defendant, who had not sought an earlier election of theories, was not entitled to a jury instruc tion of the lesser included offenses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Neely
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-07-21· cited 1,064×
- Tennant v. Marion Health Care Foundation, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 308×
- State v. McGinnisWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-12-08· cited 257×
- State v. DerrWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-11-18· cited 250×
- State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-09-05· cited 121×
- State v. BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-03-17· cited 72×
- State v. KnucklesWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1996-05-17· cited 53×
- State v. MasonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 41×
- State v. CarricoWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 33×
- State v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2004-03-24· cited 27×
- State of West Virginia v. Jeremy LambertWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2015-09-17· cited 26×
- State v. HughesWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2010-02-11· cited 24×
- State of West Virginia v. Christopher Wayne BowlingWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2013-10-08· cited 18×
- Stuckey v. TrentWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1998-07-02· cited 15×
- State v. PhelpsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1996-10-11· cited 14×
- State v. HottleWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1996-07-17· cited 8×
- State v. LeggWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2005-11-21· cited 7×
- State v. HortonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1998-06-22· cited 5×
- State v. JenkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 4×
- Hamilton v. RavasioWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-11-18· cited 2×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Edward Charles L.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-09-21· cited 2,400×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- State v. AtkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1979-07-17· cited 145×
- State v. WilliamsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 134×
- State v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1972-12-19· cited 125×
- State v. NeiderWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-09-20· cited 111×
- State v. PeacherWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-07-14· cited 110×
- State v. James Edward S.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-12-12· cited 61×
- State v. YoungWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-12-19· cited 54×
- State v. DunnWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1978-07-11· cited 49×
- State v. GangwerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-01-22· cited 49×
- State v. GumWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-11-10· cited 43×
- State v. DuellWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1985-06-27· cited 19×
- State v. KlemArizona Supreme Court· 1972-06-15· cited 17×
- State v. GilesWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-06-07· cited 14×
- State v. McCartyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 6×
- State v. BerryWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1986-04-03· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.