Skip to main content
· 9/17/2015

State of West Virginia v. Jeremy Lambert

Citations

  • 236 W. Va. 80
  • 777 S.E.2d 649
  • 2015 W. Va. LEXIS 922

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statements made by defendant to a psychiatrist were admissible under the Rule
  • “We summarily reject this dubious and inadequately briefed issue.”
  • “We summarily reject this dubious and inadequately briefed issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.