State v. Neider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the holding of Louk but finding that the defendant had not contested the particular elements that distinguished the two offenses
• finding no error where sworn veniremen who had read newspaper article about a jail break indicated they could be unbiased
• “It is clear that robbery at common law encompassed the same elements as a larceny and included two additional elements.”
• “It is clear that robbery at common law encompassed the same elements as a larceny 12 and included two additional elements.”
• “Where there is no evidentiary dispute or insufficiency on the elements of the greater offense which are different from the elements of the lesser included offense, then the defendant is not entitled to a lesser included offense instruction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).