West Virginia Supreme Court· 2/11/2010

State v. Hughes

Citations

691 S.E.2d 813
225 W. Va. 218
2010 W. Va. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

surveying cases and finding it is “universally accepted” that a trial court may allow the jury, while deliberating, to return to open court to review a tape recording admitted into evidence
it is “universally accepted” that a trial court may allow the jury, during deliberations, to return to open court to review a tape recording admitted in evidence
“[A]s a general rule, we will not pass upon an issue raised for the first time on appeal.”
“Our law is clear in holding that, as a general rule, we will not pass upon an issue raised for the first time on appeal.”
“[T]he verdict form in the instant case did not make a distinction between felony murder and premeditated murder because the State did not seek a conviction for the underlying burglary felony.”
it is \universally accepted\ that a trial court may allow the jury, during deliberations, to return to open court to review a tape recording admitted in evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.