State v. Asfeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in deference to the jury’s “role as evaluator of witness credibility,” the court was required to assume “the jury disbelieved Asfeld’s claim that he did not murder [the victim]”
• finding evidence sufficient to sustain conviction and stating that defendant cannot now claim that the state failed to meet its burden simply because the jury did not believe him
• finding evidence sufficient to sustain conviction and stating that defendant cannot now claim that the state failed to meet its burden simply because the jury did not believe him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).