Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, whenever possible, a statute should be interpreted to give effect to all of its provisions and that “no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant”
• stating that “[wjhenever it is possible, no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant.”
• providing that no word in a statute “should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant”
• “Whenever it is possible, no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-01-27· cited 4×