South Dakota Supreme Court· 7/31/2002
State v. Tuttle
Citations
- 2002 SD 94
- 650 N.W.2d 20
- 2002 S.D. LEXIS 108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting Leyva and concluding that `[t]he Davis holding obviously applies to instances where suspects attempt to invoke Miranda rights after a knowing and voluntary waiver of those rights. Davis, in sum, applies to an equivocal postwaiver invocation of rights.'
- “Davis, in sum, applies to an equivocal postwaiver invocation of rights. For an initial waiver, however, the State still bears ‘a heavy burden to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived’ Miranda rights.” (quot- ing Miranda, 384 U.S. at 475)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Konenkamp, Amundson, Gilbertson, Sabers, Zinter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court· 2010-06-01· cited 1,592×
- State v. S.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2017-06-21· cited 343×
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 290×
- State of Tennessee v. David Hooper Climer, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2013-04-19· cited 170×
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-04-24· cited 129×
- State v. SwaniganSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-02-18· cited 88×
- United States v. RodriguezNinth Circuit· 2008-03-10· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-01-13· cited 59×
- State v. TofaniSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 51×
- State v. AkubaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-08-18· cited 47×
- State v. CottierSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-08-06· cited 37×
- State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-06-24· cited 32×
- State v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court· 2010-03-19· cited 32×
- State v. CarothersSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-11-15· cited 29×
- State v. OwenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-02-28· cited 29×
- State v. FisherSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-11-09· cited 26×
- Hanson-Metayer v. Hanson-MetayerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-04-12· cited 24×
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-08· cited 24×
- Cordell v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-12-10· cited 23×
- McDonough v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-01-21· cited 23×
Cites
62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 1,743×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 1,412×
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 1,403×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.