State v. Cottier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[F]actors for a trial court to consider in assessing trustworthiness of hearsay offered under the residual hearsay rule . . . include: . . . the existence of corroborating evidence . . . .”
• “Even if the trial court erred in failing to admit the video, ‘the error was harmless as the evidence was cumulative of other evidence presented independently at trial.’ ” (quoting State v. Davi, 504 N.W.2d 844, 855 (S.D. 1993))
• “Even if the trial court erred in failing to admit the video, ‘the error was harmless as the evidence was cumulative of other evidence presented independently at trial.’ ” (quoting State v. Davi, 504 N.W.2d 844, 855 (S.D. 1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).