Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/20/2014

State v. Tooley

Citations

265 Or. App. 30
333 P.3d 348
2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that defendant’s physical and emotional abuse throughout the course of the night was “continuous and uninterrupted”
applying that standard to a denial of a request to admit evidence under OEC 106
determining that OEC 106 does not supply an independent basis for admission of the defendant’s own hearsay state- ments made during a police interview following the state’s admission of other portions of the same interview
“OEC 106 does not apply to allow admission of supplementary evidence that is other- wise inadmissible.”
“OEC 106 does not apply to allow admission of supplemen- tary evidence that is otherwise inadmissible.”
“OEC 106 does not apply to allow admission of supplementary evidence that is otherwise inadmissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.