Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/29/1997
State v. Mayer
Citations
- 932 P.2d 570
- 146 Or. App. 86
- 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 73
- 1997 WL 37430
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “knowingly” means defendant acted with awareness, not a conscious objective as with the mental state of “intentionally”
- focusing on what the child knew and understood about the examination
- “ ‘Insufficiency of evidence’ is not a legitimate ground for a motion in arrest of judgment[.]”
- “In the absence of [required predicate factual] findings, we cannot say that the trial court properly admitted child’s [hearsay] statements.”
- corroboration cannot come from out-of-court statement admissible under another hearsay exception
- remanding to trial court to make findings regarding corroboration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deits, De Muniz Haselton, De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. PfaffCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-22· cited 32×
- State v. Van OsdolCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-21· cited 17×
- State v. TooleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-20· cited 17×
- United States v. BaheD. New Mexico· 1998-11-25· cited 15×
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-21· cited 14×
- State v. CarrilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-13· cited 8×
- Department of Human Services v. J. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-08-14· cited 7×
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-17· cited 6×
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-20· cited 6×
- State v. Hernandez-FabianCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 3×
- State v. LapraimCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-03-20
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 332×
- State v. MoenOregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-11· cited 189×
- State v. BarkleyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-19· cited 51×
- State v. KitzmanOregon Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 42×
- State v. FrancisOregon Supreme Court· 1978-12-27· cited 32×
- State v. SullensOregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 30×
- State v. RenlyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-26· cited 27×
- State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court· 1980-02-06· cited 21×
- State v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-11-03· cited 10×
- State v. JantziCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-02-22· cited 8×
- State v. Van WalchrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-04-01· cited 6×
- State v. HuieCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-06-29· cited 4×
- State v. HuieOregon Supreme Court· 1982-01-05· cited 2×
- State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-13· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.