Ohio Supreme Court· 7/25/2007

State v. Tooley

Citations

114 Ohio St. 3d 366
872 N.E.2d 894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[M]orphed child pornography that uses images of real children ... is not covered by the Ashcroft definition of protected virtual child pornography.”
\[M]orphed child pornography that uses images of real children . . . is not covered by the Ashcroft definition of protected virtual child pornography.\
\Ashcroft did not impose a heightened evidentiary burden on the state to ... use expert testimony to prove that the image contains a real child\
refusing to extend Ashcroft to cover morphed child pornography

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Began, Connor, Consideration, Cupp, Donnell, Ended, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sadler, Stratton, Tenth, Whose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Tooley

16 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.