Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/3/2020

State v. Barton

Citations

304 Or. App. 481
468 P.3d 510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

describing ORS 498.002(1) as punishing “the unlawful acquisition of state property”
describing ORS 498.002(1) as punishing “the unlawful acquisition of state property”
“The state, as the party asserting that defendant’s conduct is separately punishable for purposes of ORS 161.067(3), bears the burden of adducing legally suf- ficient evidence of the requisite sufficient pause.” (Internal quotation marks and ellipses omitted.)
“The state, as the party asserting that defendant’s conduct is separately punishable for purposes of ORS 161.067(3), bears the burden of adducing legally suf- ficient evidence of the requisite sufficient pause.” (Internal quotation marks and ellipses omitted.)
“The state, as the party asserting that defendant’s conduct is separately punishable for purposes of ORS 161.067(3), bears the burden of adducing legally suf- ficient evidence of the requisite sufficient pause.” (Internal quotation marks and ellipses omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.