Huffman v. BRUNSMAN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a habeas claim moot because petitioner received the relief he requested when the Ohio Court of Appeals remanded the case to the trial court for re-sentencing
• “[A] person challenging a statute must prove that the statute is unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt.” -21- HOLMES V. MOORE Opinion of the Court (citing State v. Anderson, 57 Ohio St. 3d 168, 171, 566 N.E.2d 1224, 1226 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).