Skip to main content
· 11/17/2017

State v. Videen

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 8608

Syllabus

The trial court's decision overruling Appellant's Crim.R. 33 motion for new trial without a hearing was not an abuse of discretion, as the motion was untimely and Appellant failed to provide clear and convincing evidence showing that he was unavoidably prevented from timely filing the motion. Affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.