United States v. Christopher Shawn Deaton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaffirming the reasonableness of a “jury’s conclusion that real children were depicted, even where the images themselves were the only evidence the government presented on the subject.”
• upholding a jury’s conclusion that real children were depicted where images themselves were only evidence presented on the subject
• upholding jury = s conclusion that pictures depicted actual children A where the images themselves were the only evidence the government presented on the subject @
• upholding jury conclusion that images were child pornography based on the images themselves
• jury’s conclusion that real children were depicted may be upheld even when the only evidence offered was the images themselves
• “Further, we have previously upheld a jury’s conclusion that real children were depicted even where the images themselves were the only evidence the government presented on the subject”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).