Skip to main content

Portillo Funes v. State

Citations

  • 230 A.3d 121
  • 469 Md. 438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, on appellate review of a motion to suppress, this Court “accepts the suppression court’s factual findings and credibility determinations, unless clearly erroneous[]”
  • “An appellate court reviews de novo a trial court’s determination as to whether evidence is relevant.”
  • “An appellate court reviews de novo a trial court’s determination as to whether evidence is relevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Getty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.