Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 445 Md. 452
  • 128 A.3d 30
  • 2015 Md. LEXIS 863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a defendant’s request must be unambiguous, meaning that “a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement to be an invocation of the right to silence.”
  • analyzing the statement 1 The U.S. Supreme Court discussed several aspects of The Reid Technique in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966
  • analyzing the statement “I don’t want to say nothing. I don’t know” in isolation and as part of an “extended colloquy”
  • \I don't wanna talk no more\ held to be an unambiguous invocation
  • dissenting opinion by McDonald, J.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera, Battaglia, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.