Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/18/2015
Williams v. State
Citations
- 445 Md. 452
- 128 A.3d 30
- 2015 Md. LEXIS 863
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a defendant’s request must be unambiguous, meaning that “a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement to be an invocation of the right to silence.”
- analyzing the statement 1 The U.S. Supreme Court discussed several aspects of The Reid Technique in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966
- analyzing the statement “I don’t want to say nothing. I don’t know” in isolation and as part of an “extended colloquy”
- \I don't wanna talk no more\ held to be an unambiguous invocation
- dissenting opinion by McDonald, J.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barbera, Battaglia, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bellard v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-08-31· cited 5×
- Gupta v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-04-28· cited 4×
- Madrid v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-10-01· cited 4×
- Gupta v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-24· cited 2×
- Vargas-Salguero v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-06-01· cited 2×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-09-02
- Soares v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-11-18
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court· 2010-06-01· cited 1,592×
- People v. ArroyaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-11-30· cited 226×
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-17· cited 161×
- Hillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-05· cited 136×
- Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-09-10· cited 121×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-08-27· cited 116×
- United States v. Dontay Banks, Mario Dunlap, Michael Wills, Alton Mills, Robert Gaines, Monica Boguille, and Robert ShippSeventh Circuit· 1996-05-14· cited 70×
- State v. StrayhandCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-09-07· cited 49×
- Billy-Eko v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 33×
- State v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-06-08· cited 26×
- Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 24×
- Baynor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-31· cited 23×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-01-26· cited 21×
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1997-07-25· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.