Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 533 S.W.3d 781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “‘[c]ross-referencing a motion in limine in an objection has been found to preserve a claim of evidentiary error to the extent the objection was contained within the motion’” (quoting State v. Evans, 517 S.W.3d 528, 543 (Mo. App. S.D. 2015)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bates, Francis, Rahmeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.