Ninth Circuit· 8/24/2005

United States v. William Weiland

Citations

420 F.3d 1062
68 Fed. R. Serv. 64
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 18149
2005 WL 2027338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “a routine certification by the custodian of a domestic public record ... and a routine attestation to authority and signature ... are not testimonial in nature” (citation omitted)
holding that documents, even if “prepared for the purposes of litigation,” are not testimonial where they involve “routine cataloguing of an unambiguous factual matter”
holding that documents, even if “prepared for the purposes of litigation,” are not testimonial where they involve “routine cataloguing of an unambiguous factual matter”
holding that \a routine certification by the custodian of a domestic public record . . . [is] not testimonial in nature\
holding that a local law enforcement official deputized as a Special Deputy U.S. Marshal was a “federal law enforcement officer” for the purposes of Rule 41
holding that \a routine certification by the custodian of a domestic public record . . . and a routine attestation to authority and signature . . . are not testimonial in nature\ for purposes of Crawford

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fernandez, Tashima, Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

301 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.