Skip to main content

State v. Nash

Citations

  • 339 S.W.3d 500
  • 2011 Mo. LEXIS 122
  • 2011 WL 2002737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “Grim abrogated the circumstantial evidence rule and rejected the use of the circumstantial evidence instruction”
  • “[s]tatutes cannot be interpreted in ways that yield unreasonable or absurd results . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary R. Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

190 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.