· 3/24/2006
State v. Porting
Citations
- 281 Kan. 320
- 130 P.3d 1173
- 2006 Kan. LEXIS 163
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding error admitting evidence found in search of the defendants' residence in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights was not harmless, when the evidence obtained was the only evidence against the defendants
- discussing the distinction between mistake of fact and mistake of law with regard to apparent authority and third party consent
- Officer was not mistaken about the facts, but reached an erroneous legal conclusion based on the facts.
- overnight guest had- expectation of privacy and standing to object to search of residence
- “The State had the burden to affirmatively show objective facts supporting [inviter’s] common authority.”
- discussing and applying both Matlock and Rodriguez
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Luckert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.