Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/26/2001
State v. Jones
Citations
- 17 P.3d 359
- 270 Kan. 526
- 2001 Kan. LEXIS 5
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that any conclusion that police cannot arrest a person on a valid warrant after an illegal stop is “illogical and nonsensical”
- resolving the attenuation issue almost exclusively with respect to the intervening circumstance of the discovery of an arrest warrant between the time of the challenged stop and the seizure of contraband
- resolving the attenuation issue almost exclusively with respect to the intervening circumstance of the discovery of an arrest warrant between the time of the challenged stop and the seizure of contraband
- resolving the attenuation issue almost exclusively with respect to the intervening circumstance of the discovery of an arrest warrant between the time of the challenged stop and the seizure of contraband
- relying on Green and concluding that, because there was no evidence of bad faith on the part of the officer, once he discovered the outstanding warrant, the officer had the right and duty to arrest the defendant and effect a subsequent search
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Abbott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. EliasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-04-06· cited 261×
- State v. PageIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-12-15· cited 99×
- State v. NeceSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-02-26· cited 86×
- State of Texas v. Mazuca, AlvaroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-05-23· cited 67×
- State v. FriersonSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-02-09· cited 57×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-03-28· cited 51×
- Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-24· cited 45×
- State v. SotoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-01-08· cited 39×
- State v. MendezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-04-18· cited 37×
- State v. SotoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-02-28· cited 35×
- State v. MoralezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-05-17· cited 35×
- Hornberger v. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-05-21· cited 30×
- People v. ReeseMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-10-14· cited 27×
- Jacobs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-02-01· cited 24×
- McBath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-02-18· cited 24×
- People v. BatesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-12-12· cited 17×
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-10-10· cited 15×
- Frierson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-06· cited 14×
- Myers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-04· cited 7×
- State v. CarneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-12-18· cited 7×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1998-11-06· cited 60×
- Reed v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-05-15· cited 55×
- State v. RothenbergerWashington Supreme Court· 1968-04-18· cited 45×
- State v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-04-07· cited 42×
- People v. HillyardSupreme Court of Colorado· 1979-01-29· cited 38×
- People v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-03-23· cited 30×
- State v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-07-09· cited 17×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-05-05· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.