Court of Appeals of Kansas· 10/3/1997
State v. Jones
Citations
- 947 P.2d 1030
- 24 Kan. App. 2d 405
- 1997 Kan. App. LEXIS 155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the officers’ actions are judged on the basis of the facts facing them at moment of their decision and are evaluated objectively
- emergency doctrine recognized in State v. Jones, 2 Kan. App. 2d 38, 573 P.2d 1134 [1978]
- emergency doctrine recognized in State v. Jones, 2 Kan. App. 2d 38, 573 P.2d 1134 [1978]
- emergency doctrine recognized in State v. Jones, 2 Kan. App. 2d 38, 573 P.2d 1134 [1978]; State v. Marsh, 16 Kan. App. 2d 377, 381-87, 823 P.2d 823 (1991
- although die possibility of criminal activity might account for the feared danger in a given case, the primary motive of the police will not be to search for evidence of a crime but rather to render assistance
- although the possibility of criminal activity might account for the feared danger in a given case, the primary motive of the police will not be to search for evidence of a crime, but rather to render assistance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pierron, Elliott, Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-04-25· cited 153×
- State v. HornSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-06-18· cited 59×
- State v. IbarraSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-12-08· cited 51×
- State v. DrennanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-17· cited 48×
- State v. MendezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-04-18· cited 37×
- Salt Lake City v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2000-01-27· cited 23×
- State v. MountfordSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-12-29· cited 22×
- State v. RyderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-08-09· cited 20×
- State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-10-04· cited 16×
- People v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-02-28· cited 13×
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1999-12-10· cited 12×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-04-06· cited 6×
- State v. GeraghtyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-07-20· cited 5×
- State v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-09-01· cited 2×
- State v. JefferyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-01-11· cited 1×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,715×
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,044×
- People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-04-29· cited 574×
- Lewis L. Wayne v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1963-04-04· cited 479×
- People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-04-06· cited 458×
- State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court· 1984-06-14· cited 190×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-05-28· cited 56×
- People v. KruegerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-02-21· cited 55×
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-06-07· cited 49×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-01-26· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. SiloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-12· cited 44×
- State v. BoyleSupreme Court of Kansas· 1971-07-12· cited 37×
- Gallmeyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-02-18· cited 31×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-10-28· cited 16×
- Geimer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-05-27· cited 15×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1978-01-27· cited 13×
- State v. MiesbauerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-12-03· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.