Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/8/1989

State v. Brown

Citations

783 P.2d 1278
245 Kan. 604
1989 Kan. LEXIS 196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “generally, a threat to obtain rather than a threat to seek a search warrant will invalidate a subsequent consent if there were not then grounds upon which a warrant could issue”
explaining that if an “officer states that a search warrant can be obtained and, in fact, there are grounds for the issuance of a warrant, the statement is correct and does not constitute coercion
inevitable discovery rule applied when defendant consented to a search while police were in process of obtaining a warrant
“The lesson from both Ybarra and Lambert is that the police may not expand the scope of a search warrant without first obtaining judicial approval.”
when warrantless search is justified by consent, consent must be voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly given
when warrantless search is justified by consent, consent must be voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett, Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.