Skip to main content

State v. Thompson

Citations

  • 578 N.W.2d 734
  • 1998 Minn. LEXIS 282
  • 1998 WL 239305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecution’s statements speculating about the crime and the state of mind of the victims were improper
  • holding that “the evidence of guilt is so overwhelming that a simple review of the facts substantiated by the evidence spins out a web of guilt more persuasive than anything that could be added through the prosecutor’s inappropriate [statements concerning O.J. Simpson]”
  • concluding that remarks that contained pure speculation without factual basis were improper
  • holding, under a “totality of the circumstances” test, that police obtained consent from a person with apparent authority
  • holding, without deference to the district court, that police obtained consent to search from someone with apparent authority
  • holding that “the evidence of guilt is so overwhelming that a simple review of the facts substantiated by the evidence spins out a web of guilt more persuasive than anything that could be added through the prosecutor’s inappropriate [statements concerning O.J. Simpson]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilbert, Stringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.