State v. Dotson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply the inevitable-discovery doctrine based on “mere speculation” that law enforcement would have lawfully obtained the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Minnesota v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-07-29
• State of Minnesota v. Matthew Starnes
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-05-06

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• United States v. Matlock
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
• Nix v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
• Illinois v. McArthur
  Supreme Court· 2001-02-20· cited 735×
• State v. Diede
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-03-30· cited 184×
• State of Minnesota v. Heather Leann Horst
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-05-18· cited 76×
• State v. Ortega
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-07-30· cited 71×
• State v. Licari
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-17· cited 57×
• State v. Richards
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-07-18· cited 56×
• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-05-14· cited 47×
• State of Minnesota v. Ryan Mark Thompson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-10-12· cited 35×
• State v. Hodges
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-11-23· cited 24×
• State of Minnesota v. Roger Earl Holland
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-06-24· cited 14×
• Eugene Lee Rushton v. State of Minnesota
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-01-25· cited 6×
• State of Minnesota v. Matthew Vaughn Diamond
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-01-17· cited 2×
• State v. Sterling
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-05-18· cited 1×