Skip to main content
· 4/20/1999

Tracht v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Citations

  • 592 N.W.2d 863
  • 1999 Minn. App. LEXIS 393
  • 1999 WL 228406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the officer’s entry was analogous to entry onto a porch under the Fourth Amendment
  • finding officers’ entry through open garage door to conduct knock-and-talk at service door no different than entering porch to knock on door to house and thus not in violation of Fourth Amendment
  • “Police with legitimate business may enter the areas of the curtilage which are impliedly open to use by the public.” (quotation and alteration omitted)
  • entry into open garage for the purpose of knocking on the exposed service door was not a Fourth Amendment search
  • entiy into open garage for the purpose of knocking on the exposed service door was not a Fourth Amendment search
  • “Police with legitimate business may enter the areas of curtilage which are impliedly open to use by the public.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davies, Peterson, Halbrooks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.