Skip to main content

State v. Licari

Citations

  • 659 N.W.2d 243
  • 2003 Minn. LEXIS 203
  • 2003 WL 1893268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “searches based on honest, reasonable mistakes of fact are unobjectionable under the Fourth Amendment”
  • explaining that a defendant must first establish a legitimate expectation of privacy in a storage unit before contesting its search
  • explaining that a defendant must first establish a legitimate expectation of privacy in a storage unit before contesting its search
  • accepting that current co-occupant may give valid consent but concluding that landlord does not enjoy mutual use necessary to give valid consent
  • remanding to determine if physical evidence would have been inevitably discovered on defendant
  • remanding to determine if physical evidence would have been inevitably discovered on defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson, Meyer, Gilbert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.