Arizona Supreme Court· 2/24/1977
State v. Smith
Citations
- 561 P.2d 739
- 114 Ariz. 415
- 1977 Ariz. LEXIS 275
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that fundamental error is “error of such dimensions that it cannot be said it is possible for a defendant to have had a fair trial”
- noting that fundamental error is \error of such dimensions that it cannot be said it is possible for a defendant to have had a fair trial\
- defining fundamental error as “error of such dimensions that it cannot be said it is possible for a defendant to have had a fair trial”
- finding no error in lack of voluntariness hearing where defendant did not object to admission of his statements
- trial court not required to determine the voluntariness of confession sua sponte
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Gordon, Hays, Holohan, Struckmeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court· 2004-08-09· cited 424×
- State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 206×
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 175×
- State v. ConnerArizona Supreme Court· 1990-01-09· cited 148×
- State v. ZaragozaArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-10· cited 131×
- State v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court· 1981-11-06· cited 116×
- State v. HillArizona Supreme Court· 1993-01-14· cited 111×
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court· 1988-09-22· cited 105×
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-13· cited 101×
- State v. RoseArizona Supreme Court· 1978-12-22· cited 97×
- State v. McMurtreyArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 95×
- State v. SchadArizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-13· cited 95×
- State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-07· cited 92×
- State v. ViaArizona Supreme Court· 1985-06-12· cited 90×
- State v. BaumannArizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 72×
- State v. RoseberryArizona Supreme Court· 2005-05-11· cited 59×
- State v. KinkadeArizona Supreme Court· 1984-03-12· cited 55×
- State v. LibbertonArizona Supreme Court· 1984-04-23· cited 53×
- Estes v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1986-07-31· cited 53×
- State v. PrinceArizona Supreme Court· 2003-01-16· cited 53×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 250×
- Sullivan v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1936-03-02· cited 92×
- State v. VillavicencioArizona Supreme Court· 1964-01-08· cited 80×
- State v. OwenArizona Supreme Court· 1964-07-13· cited 76×
- State v. FinnArizona Supreme Court· 1974-11-21· cited 61×
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 53×
- State v. JaramilloArizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-10· cited 26×
- State v. LovellArizona Supreme Court· 1965-03-03· cited 21×
- State v. RigginsArizona Supreme Court· 1974-11-14· cited 21×
- Felton M. Hilliard v. State of ArizonaNinth Circuit· 1966-06-24· cited 16×
- State v. BrayArizona Supreme Court· 1970-07-06· cited 14×
- State v. ArmstrongArizona Supreme Court· 1968-05-16· cited 14×
- State v. ScanlonArizona Supreme Court· 1969-02-07· cited 11×
- State v. MolinaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-06-06· cited 6×
- State v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-03-12· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.