Skip to main content

State v. Terrell Hubbard (073539)

Citations

  • 222 N.J. 249
  • 118 A.3d 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that questioning as part of an investigation, where the individual is not a suspect, does not implicate a A-0527-20 20 defendant's Miranda rights
  • holding the issue of whether a defendant was in custody is for the trial court to decide and is not subject to de novo review on appeal
  • finding statements A-5935-17 16 made during a custodial interrogation without the administration of Miranda warnings \must be suppressed\
  • ‘‘[f]ollowing a comprehensive study of ‘whether and how to implement the benefits of recording electronically part, or all, of custodial interrogations,’ State v. Cook, 179 N.J. 533, 561, 847 A.2d 530 (2004), the [c]ourt adopted [r]ule 3:17 in 2005’’
  • ‘‘[f]ollowing a comprehensive study of ‘whether and how to implement the benefits of recording electronically part, or all, of custodial inter- rogations,’ State v. Cook, 179 N.J. 533, 561, 847 A.2d 530 (2004), the [c]ourt adopted [r]ule 3:17 in 2005’’
  • ‘‘[f]ollowing a comprehensive study of ‘whether and how to implement the benefits of recording elec- tronically part, or all, of custodial interrogations,’ State v. Cook, 179 N.J. 533, 561, 847 A.2d 530 (2004), the [c]ourt adopted [r]ule 3:17 in 2005’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cuff, Albin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.