Skip to main content

State v. Anthony

Citations

  • 204 A.3d 229
  • 237 N.J. 213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a defendant is entitled to a Wade/Henderson hearing if no electronic or contemporaneous, verbatim recording of an identification procedure was made or provided
  • relying on the Court’s supervisory powers to require that a record be made of identification procedures, now codified at Rule 3:11
  • “We have not, however, created bright-line rules that call for the ‘suppression of reliable evidence any time a law enforcement officer makes a mistake.’” (quoting Henderson, 208 N.J. at 303)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.