Skip to main content
· 2/23/2010

State v. Gandhi

Citations

  • 989 A.2d 256
  • 201 N.J. 161
  • 2010 N.J. LEXIS 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that legal conclusions of trial or intermediate appellate court in sentencing context are reviewed de novo
  • stating that \a defendant is bound to obey [a] court's order until the order is vacated through a judicial proceeding\
  • noting that stalking requires a course of conduct that would cause a reasonable person fear
  • upholding the original 1992 version, L. 1992, c. 209, § 1, against a First Amendment overbreadth and vagueness challenge
  • noting the best indicator of legislative intent is most often the plain language of the statute
  • upholding the original 1992 version, L. 1992, c. 209, § 1, against a First Amendment overbreadth and vagueness challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: LaVECCHIA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.