· 4/28/1980
Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.
Citations
- 446 U.S. 238
- 100 S. Ct. 1610
- 64 L. Ed. 2d 182
- 1980 U.S. LEXIS 126
- 24 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 681
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is exceedingly improbable that . . . enforcement decisions would be distorted by some expectation that all of these contingencies would . . . come to fruition.”
- prosecutors not held to same standard of impartiality as judges
- applying procedural due process analysis to claim of partial prosecution
- “[Jjustice must satisfy the appearance of justice, and this stringent rule may sometimes bar trial by judges who have no actual bias and who would do their very best to weigh the scales of justice equally between contending parties.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)
- addressing a similar claim on summary judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.