State v. Tarr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “a trial court is not required to give a proposed instruction when its substance is adequately covered by other instructions.”
• when determining whether jury instructions adequately state law, we must review them in entirety and may consider closing arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gulli
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-03-02· cited 2×
• State v. Malone
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-07-24· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Roque
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-14· cited 207×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1998-07-14· cited 123×
• State v. Portillo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 115×
• State v. Cox
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2007-12-21· cited 102×
• State v. KUHS
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2010-02-24· cited 58×
• State v. Bruggeman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-03-28· cited 43×
• State v. Zavala
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-06-07· cited 41×
• State v. PAREDES-SOLANO
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-12-24· cited 38×
• State v. Martinez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2008-07-25· cited 37×
• State v. Zaragoza
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2009-06-03· cited 26×
• State v. Love
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-27· cited 23×
• State v. Carrasco
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-10-30· cited 21×