Skip to main content

State v. Cox

Citations

  • 174 P.3d 265
  • 217 Ariz. 353
  • 2007 Ariz. LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that questions of witness credibility and the weight to give testimony are exclusively for the factfinder
  • noting that “control is not a technical term” and “has a commonly understood meaning”
  • holding there was sufficient evidence to support conviction for misconduct involving weapons where the State showed the defendant “(1) knew that the guns were in the trunk and (2) [defendant] exercised control over them.”
  • holding that jury resolves witness credibility
  • noting sufficient evidence of “knowingly” based on a combination of direct and circumstantial evidence
  • declining to interpret an “intent to use” mental state into the charge of possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berch, McGregor, Ryan, Hurwitz, Bales

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.