Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/21/1998
State v. Swain
Citations
- 245 Conn. 442
- 718 A.2d 1
- 1998 Conn. LEXIS 250
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding General Statutes § 14-111, governing suspension or revocation of operator’s license, valid exercise of state police power
- General Statutes § 14-215 [a] does not contain implied requirement that defendant knew of driver’s license suspension
- \the legislature has promulgated `an unambiguous policy aimed at ensuring that our highways are safe from carnage associated with drunken drivers.'\
- “[i]n Connecticut, the legislature has promulgated an unambiguous policy aimed at ensuring that our highways are safe from the carnage associated with drunken drivers” [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan, Norcott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-10· cited 115×
- State v. DonahueSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-21· cited 70×
- State v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-07-29· cited 60×
- State v. T.R.D.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-03-25· cited 57×
- State v. TRDSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-03-25· cited 56×
- State v. McCraineWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2003-05-20· cited 36×
- State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-06-01· cited 25×
- State v. AndresenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-29· cited 23×
- State v. Van EckConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-04-30· cited 17×
- State v. ValinskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-04-28· cited 8×
- State v. DorissConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-17· cited 8×
- State v. LEGRANDConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-06-07· cited 5×
- State v. ShippConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-09-16· cited 5×
- Loftus v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-09-13· cited 4×
- State v. NanowskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-02-15· cited 4×
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-03-30· cited 2×
- State v. TudiscaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-04-17· cited 2×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court· 1971-05-24· cited 2,202×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 1,267×
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court· 1922-03-27· cited 605×
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-20· cited 205×
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-05· cited 123×
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-12-06· cited 116×
- State v. SulSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1958-12-24· cited 103×
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-22· cited 99×
- State v. DashSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-29· cited 87×
- State v. CollovaWisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-07-01· cited 81×
- State v. HickamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-26· cited 70×
- State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court· 1982-10-05· cited 69×
- State v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-02· cited 61×
- State v. KeihnIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-08-10· cited 59×
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-02-23· cited 44×
- Zamarripa v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court· 1987-12-31· cited 43×
- People v. LeshSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-08-29· cited 43×
- Weyls v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-10-27· cited 34×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-05-08· cited 23×
- Hickey v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-01-27· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.