Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/29/2003

State v. Higgins

Citations

265 Conn. 35
826 A.2d 1126
2003 Conn. LEXIS 298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that, when defendant does not brief separately claim under Connecticut constitution, we limit our review to United States constitution
noting that, when defendant does not brief claims under Connecticut constitution separately, we limit our review to United States constitution
recognizing, in dictum, that statute may be so overinclusive or underinclusive that it does not rationally advance legislative purpose
discussing, as part of equal protection claim analysis, whether defendant raised claim that statute is underinclusive or overinclusive
presence of two uniformed officers seated behind defendant did not prejudice him such that mistrial should have been granted
under capital felony statute, General Statutes § 53a-54b [8], accessory need not be aware of victim’s age while acting with intent requisite for murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.