Connecticut Appellate Court· 4/28/1999
State v. Valinski
Citations
- 53 Conn. App. 23
- 731 A.2d 311
- 1999 Conn. App. LEXIS 150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- legislation should be interpreted rationally to obtain rational result consistent with its legislative purpose
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Antony B.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-08-17· cited 85×
- Amodio v. AmodioConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-01-25· cited 32×
- Weinstein v. WeinsteinConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-11-20· cited 30×
- State v. ValinskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-08-08· cited 20×
- State v. ValinskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-02-06· cited 3×
- State v. ValinskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-23· cited 1×
- State v. DavidsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-05-02· cited 1×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 917×
- Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1978-05-30· cited 844×
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-09-01· cited 364×
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-18· cited 182×
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-05-04· cited 123×
- State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-17· cited 113×
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-31· cited 99×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-12-31· cited 88×
- State v. SaurisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 81×
- State v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-13· cited 59×
- State v. HartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-07· cited 56×
- State v. MercerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-06-21· cited 55×
- State v. TinsleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-07-01· cited 52×
- Kelemen v. Rimrock Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-05-24· cited 51×
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-06-14· cited 48×
- State v. FaustSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-25· cited 45×
- State v. CerilliSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-04· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.