Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/25/2008
State v. TRD
Citations
- 942 A.2d 1000
- 286 Conn. 191
- 2008 Conn. LEXIS 96
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- state aggrieved where judgment upholding defendant’s probation revocation was in state’s favor, but fell short of relief sought; i.e., dismissal of appeal
- registration requirement is not punitive but, rather, ‘‘a ‘separate regulatory incident’ of a criminal judgment of conviction’’
- claim not considered because it was inadequately briefed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-08-19· cited 196×
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-05-26· cited 74×
- State v. ANGEL T.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-30· cited 67×
- State v. ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-14· cited 66×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 62×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-11-25· cited 61×
- Goldstar Medical Services, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-09-23· cited 56×
- State v. PrestonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-08· cited 54×
- Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-10-21· cited 48×
- State v. T.D.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-08· cited 47×
- State v. TDSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-08· cited 46×
- State v. HolnessSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-11-18· cited 45×
- State v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-09-15· cited 33×
- State v. GriggsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-29· cited 29×
- State v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-12-17· cited 16×
- State v. PentlandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-18· cited 13×
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AutoritySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-05-19· cited 13×
- Dennis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-04-03· cited 9×
- Council v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-28· cited 9×
- State v. FowlerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2017-11-28· cited 9×
Cites
52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 2,192×
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,491×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 1,267×
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court· 2006-04-26· cited 901×
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1958-01-27· cited 895×
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-18· cited 496×
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 487×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- United States v. William Stewart McDowellSixth Circuit· 1987-04-27· cited 190×
- Campfield v. Stickman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at GreeneSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 186×
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-05· cited 123×
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-06-27· cited 107×
- United States v. Manuel Hurtado, Also Known as Jorge Vega, Also Known as ManoloSecond Circuit· 1995-02-16· cited 97×
- State v. GabrielSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-03-13· cited 95×
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-09-30· cited 92×
- People v. MolnarIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 84×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.