· 12/31/1987
Zamarripa v. First Judicial District Court
Citations
- 747 P.2d 1386
- 103 Nev. 638
- 1987 Nev. LEXIS 1887
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a writ of certiorari is an extraordinary remedy and the decision to entertain such a writ lies within the discretion of this court
- holding that notice was sufficient when mailed to last known address; defendant contending that he did not receive notice must show that “his failure to receive the letter was the result of something other than his own culpable or dilatory conduct”
- \A writ of certiorari is an extraordinary remedy and the decision to entertain a petition for a writ of certiorari lies within the discretion of this court.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young, Gunderson, Steffen, Springer, Mowbray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.