Skip to main content
· 12/31/1987

Zamarripa v. First Judicial District Court

Citations

  • 747 P.2d 1386
  • 103 Nev. 638
  • 1987 Nev. LEXIS 1887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a writ of certiorari is an extraordinary remedy and the decision to entertain such a writ lies within the discretion of this court
  • holding that notice was sufficient when mailed to last known address; defendant contending that he did not receive notice must show that “his failure to receive the letter was the result of something other than his own culpable or dilatory conduct”
  • \A writ of certiorari is an extraordinary remedy and the decision to entertain a petition for a writ of certiorari lies within the discretion of this court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Gunderson, Steffen, Springer, Mowbray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.