Connecticut Appellate Court· 12/3/1996
State v. Stevenson
Citations
- 43 Conn. App. 680
- 686 A.2d 500
- 1996 Conn. App. LEXIS 557
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that six day trial involving two incidents not unnecessarily long, complex
- victim’s history of general delusions not specifically sexual delusions and not admissible to establish falsity of prior accusations
- “when all of the cases sought to be consolidated are brutal or shocking, they may be joined properly, if consolidation does not cause a high risk of one case being tainted by the unusually shocking ... or brutal nature of the other, or others”
- ‘‘when all of the cases sought to be consolidated are brutal or shocking, they may be joined properly, if consolidation does not cause a high risk of one case being tainted by the unusually shocking (e.g., sexual derangement) or brutal nature of the other, or others’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dupont
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-07-27· cited 66×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-05-12· cited 50×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-03-18· cited 36×
- State v. RadzvilowiczConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-09-30· cited 36×
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-01-27· cited 26×
- State v. WalshConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-04-13· cited 26×
- State v. BanksConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-08-01· cited 24×
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-09-09· cited 23×
- State v. SwainConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-05-22· cited 21×
- State v. HiltonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-05-20· cited 21×
- State v. David P.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-06-18· cited 20×
- State v. LewisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-10-03· cited 18×
- State v. MoralesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-05-13· cited 17×
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-04-06· cited 5×
- State v. GarlingtonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-07-06· cited 4×
- State v. MortonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-08-22· cited 3×
- State v. James A.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-12-19· cited 1×
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-03
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-28· cited 498×
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-11-15· cited 311×
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-10-02· cited 199×
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-11· cited 186×
- State v. RuthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-10· cited 127×
- State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-12-16· cited 123×
- State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-17· cited 113×
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-02-14· cited 111×
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-25· cited 108×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-11· cited 100×
- State v. OnofrioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-09-04· cited 97×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-06-01· cited 87×
- State v. FalconeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-09· cited 81×
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-27· cited 77×
- State v. BinetSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-04-10· cited 76×
- State v. ChanceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-13· cited 71×
- State v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-11-07· cited 61×
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-18· cited 59×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-09-21· cited 57×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.