State v. Onofrio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the reasons why the right to have a proffered exhibit marked for identification is a broad right
• trial court’s improper admission of evidence of defendant’s gun collection was likely to excite passions of jurors and, therefore, was harmful
• [t]here is no talismanic ritual of words that must be spoken by a dying declarant to render statements admissible
• “[t]here is no talismanic ritual of words that must be spoken by a dying declarant” to render statements admissible
• [tjhere is no talismanic ritual of words that must be spoken by a dying declarant to render statements admissible
• ‘[tjhere is no talismanic ritual of words that must be spoken by a dying declarant’ to render statements admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).